Metaphysical Animals: How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life

Product Information

All four developed original and lasting contributions to philosophy and this book is superb at showing the intellectual development of each of them. Foot’s autobiography, I found out that Iris and Philippa had been roommates in wartime and that he had an affair with Iris till she dumped him for an economist (who ended up advising Harold Wilson), and he married Philippa on the rebound. Anscombe objected to this because of Truman's authorization of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and she tried to persuade the dons not to award the degree.

Philosophy and life are united, the book seems to be saying: not only by default, but as upbringing; as education. Clare Mac Cumhaill and Rachael Wiseman brilliantly weave together richly detailed accounts of the lives and relationships of Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch. The biographical parts of the book describe life for these women as students in the late 1930s and early 1940s as England was gripped by war, and hundreds of their male classmates left.The young Iris could be found in the greenhouse, dressed in the fawn-coloured tunic and woollen blouse that was the school’s uniform, ‘pricking out seedlings . Later, when she started studying philosophy, she remembered this scene, in which she had experienced pure colour and shape. The book begins with two short vignettes: one about Elizabeth Anscombe’s speech against the awarding of an honorary degree by oxford to Harry Truman. Written with expertise and flair, Metaphysical Animals is a vivid portrait of the endeavours and achievements of these four remarkable women.

For example, my understanding of the parable of the cave in relation to this time period's thought provided a strong foundation for the new ideas grown. it's so enjoyable to read beyond their lives in academia and see them as the bright women that they were. This is my first time reading a history of various philosophical thinkers instead of the views of one. The early Wittgenstein of the Tractatus was one of the villians, but he repudiated his earlier works and by the time these ladies came around he had gone far enough into new directions that he could be a guide and mentor for them. Mac Cumhaill and Wiseman mix biography and anecdote – the Oxford paper that jokingly recommended carrying a white pekingese during blackouts - with elements of philosophy and history, much of which I found entertaining, thought-provoking or gripping.Mary had been excited at her election to Form Captain, until she discovered it was part of the ‘Tidier Scrutton Campaign’, launched after the loss of a bicycle, music case, three screw-pencils, a badminton racket and the Book of Judges roused her classmates to action. I will make no attempt to critique this issue of naming from a feminist perspective and I can only assume the authors’ intention is to further humanize these women (although Ludwig’s personal life is discussed just as much as his philosophy as well…One could argue he is better known by his last name than his first so it is meant to be clear, but this is just as true for Murdoch, Midgley, Anscombe, and Foot, as well as *cough cough* Jean-Jacques? It is riddled with facts and figures that are very loosely attached to the lives of the four women at the center, but largely detached from what I took to be the point of the book - to highlight how these women influenced moral philosophy and brought it "back to life. The 103 third parties who use cookies on this service do so for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalized ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products.

For me, I knew it was time to quit when the discussion on war portrayed it as such a 'dreadful inconvenience' to these bright women, but beneficial in the 5 men who were their contemporaries had been killed and the when morals around the holocaust were seen as giving a good topic for one of them to study further. Each time I fall in love, repent, feel remorse, forgive, hate, trust, my understanding of these words changes, becomes more personal, more tied to me, to the particular circumstances of my life. Metaphysical Animals provides an interesting recounting of the lives and careers of four women philosophers of the mid-twentieth century. I have never read a book like this – the story of four individuals, each creative and original in her own way, and how their personal and intellectual lives intertwined. Mary and Iris also participated in Eduard Fraenkel’s Aeschylus seminar, contributing to his awesome edition of the Agamemnon and enduring his deplorable habit of groping women students, behaviour intolerable today.

As a child, she preferred collecting newts to dolls, whose stiff perms when replicated in living women unnerved her. Within months, she had her eyes trained on Miss Scrutton’s academic dress (the clothing worn under the scholar’s long black gown). The book focuses on the period from 1939 to 1951 which is but a decade in the lives of such extraordinarily long-lived women.

Elizabeth Anscombe: defiantly brilliant, chain-smoking, trouser-wearing Catholic and (eventual) mother of seven. What actually brought this book to my attention was a review of it in Philosophy Now Magazine, where the reviewer criticized the authors’ use of first names for the women, but not for the men. This book is helpful in shining a light on four women who cast a critical gaze on the arid academic discipline of British philosophy in mid-20th century, when philosophical study was limited to the abstract consideration of language and grammar. Well, well,’ she said, on hearing of Mary’s scholarship to Somerville, ‘I’d rather lose my reputation as a prophet than my reputation as a coach.Feminist philosophy has burgeoned in recent decades and includes a monumental contribution to ethical-moral thought that draws from ancient philosophy. The book gives the reader fresh insight into the life of a woman in the institutional sexism of major British universities in the mid-20th century. Together, these young women, all friends, developed a philosophy that could respond to the war's darkest revelations. The use of the main four women's first names did make them feel more intimate to readers, but it caused me some confusion when referencing others with similar names.